Decomposing polygons into simpler components. by J. Mark Keil Download PDF EPUB FB2
The problem of decomposing a polygon into simpler components is of interest in fields such as computational geometry, syntactic pattern recognition, and graphics.
In this paper we consider decompositions which do not introduce Steiner points. The simpler components we consider are convex polygons, spiral polygons, star-shaped polygons and monotone by: The decomposition of a polygon into simpler components plays an important role in syntactic pattern recognition and image processing.
A new decompostion is proposed and termed the relative neighbor decomposition (RND). The lune of two vertices p//i, p//j of a polygon P, denoted by LUNE (p//i, p//j) is defined as the intersection of two circles. Abstract:A technique for decomposition of polygons into simpler components is described and illustrated with applications in the analysis of handwritten Chinese characters and chromosomes.
Polygonal approximations of such objects are obtained by methods described in the literature and then parts of their concave angles are examined recursively for separating convex or other simple shape by: Decomposing polygons into simpler components.
book decomposition of a simple planar polygon into simpler components plays an impor-tant role in syntactic pattern recognition. Some examples of possible decompositions are decompositions into con vex polygons , , decompositions into spiral polygons  and decompositions into monotone polygons .
A survey of these methods and many other. Given a simple n-vertex polygon, the triangulation problem is to partition the interior of the polygon into n-2 triangles by adding n-3 nonintersecting diagonals.
We propose an O(n log logn)-time algorithm for this problem, improving on the previously best bound of Decomposing polygons into simpler components. book (n log. Keil [Kei85] introduces a general technique for decomposing a simple polygon into polygons of a certain type.
The technique is based on optimally decomposing subpolygons each of which is obtained from the originalby drawingasingle diagonald.
In each decomposition D ofa subpolygon there is a unique polygon P(D) that contains the diagonal. Decomposing simple polygon into simpler components is one of the basic tasks in computational geometry and its applications.
The most important simple polygon decomposition is triangulation. Different techniques for triangulating simple polygon were designed.
Several algorithms for computing the Minkowski sum of two polygons in the plane begin by decomposing each polygon into convex subpolygons.
We examine different methods for decomposing polygons by their suitability for efﬁcient construction of Minkowski sums. We study and experiment with various well-known. Abstract Decomposing a non-convex polygon into simpler subsets has been a recurrent theme in the literature due to its many applications.
In, the problem of decomposing a polygon into a minimum number of convex components by cuts in the directions of F (F is a family of non-oriented directions in the plane) is studied. There, authors have shown that the problem is NP-hard if | F | ≥ 3 and is solvable in polynomial.
[37, 39, 13, 30, 23, 33, 35] will decompose these poly-gons into the many small components that provide lit-tle information about the structure and shape of the in-put polygon. Alternatively, we can ignore the holes and simply decompose Figs. 1(c), 1(d). Several algorithms for computing the Minkowski sum of two polygons in the plane begin by decomposing each polygon into convex subpolygons.
We examine different methods for decomposing polygons by their suitability for efficient construction of Minkowski sums. The problem of decomposing a polygon into simpler components is of interest in fields such as computational geometry, syntactic pattern recognition, and graphics.
Introduction The problem of decomposing a polygon into simpler components has applications in numerous branches of computer science. In computer vision, polygonal shapes cart often be recognized more easily if its component parts have been identified (Feng & Pavlidis, ).
/90/+27 $/0 Academic Press Limited o. Decomposing Polygons - Displaying top 8 worksheets found for this concept. Some of the worksheets for this concept are Determining the area of regularirregular polygons, Georgia standards of excellence curriculum frameworks, Lesson 5 the area of polygons through composition and, 6 grade math fourth quarter unit 5 geometry topic b, Composing and decomposing two dimensional figures, Unit 4.
Decomposition of polygons into simpler components: Feature generation for syntactic pattern recognition. IEEE Trans. Comp. vC Google Scholar Digital Library; Ferrari, et al, Minimal rectangular partitions of digitized blobs. In: Proc.
5th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. Google Scholar. In computational geometry, algorithms for problems on general polygons are often more complex than those for restricted types of polygons such as convex or star-shaped. The point inclusion problem is one example. A strategy for solving some of these types of problems on general polygons is to decompose the polygon into simple component parts, solve the problem on each component using a specialized.
Polygon Partitioning. The key strategy for solving problems on simple polygons is to decompose simple polygons in simpler polygons. Trapezoidalization.
A trapezoid is a quadrilateral with at least two parallel edges. Note that a triangle is a degenerated trapezoid with a zero-length edge.
Lesson Objective: The lesson is aligned to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics – 6.G.1 Geometry – Find area of right triangles, other triangles, special quadrilaterals, and polygons by composing into rectangles or decomposing into triangles and other shapes; apply these techniques in the context of solving real-world and mathematical problems.
Algorithms for Simple Polygons Marko Lamot1, Borut Zalikˇ 2 1Hermes Softlab, Ljubljana, Slovenia 2Borut Zalik, University of Maribor, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Maribor, Sloveniaˇ Decomposing simple polygon into simpler components is one of the basic tasks in computational geometry and its applications.
An efficient algorithm for decomposing a planar polygon into star-convex components and for identifying the kernel of each component (Technical report.
Texas A & M University. Computer Science Dept) [Alford, Jennifer Reynolds] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. An efficient algorithm for decomposing a planar polygon into star-convex components and for identifying the.
$\begingroup$ What I meant is that when you decompose the four-hole gadget into convex subsets, you have to use five subsets, one of which does not contain any hole. This extra empty subset must lie inside one of the two triangular regions surrounded by the four holes, but you get to choose which of these two regions it lies in.
$\endgroup. We propose a strategy to decompose a polygon, containing zero or more holes, into \approximately convex" pieces. For many applications, the approximately convex components of this decomposition provide similar bene ts as convex components, while the resulting decomposition is signi cantly smaller and can be computed more e ciently.
Decomposing simple polygon into simpler components is one of the basic tasks in computational geometry and its applications. The most important simple polygon decomposition is triangulation.
Different techniques for triangulating simple polygon were designed. The first part of the paper is an overview of triangulation algorithms. Decomposing shapes is the process of breaking particular shapes into other shapes.
Given a large geometric shape, students are asked to break it up into smaller, known shapes. These large shapes can be known shapes themselves or simply abstract shapes. The generalization of the work of Sanzana et al. through the proposition and description of a flexible divide-and-conquer strategy for decomposing bad-shaped 2D polygons into smaller meaningful components.
This strategy is tested using both urban and peri-urban terrains and silhouette-based features, which exemplifies its potential application. Abstract. Let F be a given family of directions in the plane. The problem to partition a planar polygon P with holes into a minimum number of convex polygons by cuts in the directions of F is proved to be NP-hard if ¦F¦ ≥ 3 and it is shown to admit a polynomial-time algorithm if ¦F¦ ≤ 2.
Related Topics: Lesson Plans and Worksheets for Grade 6 Lesson Plans and Worksheets for all Grades More Lessons for Grade 6 Common Core For Grade 6 Examples, solutions, videos, and lessons to help Grade 6 students learn how to find the area of right triangles, other triangles, special quadrilaterals, and polygons by composing into rectangles or decomposing into triangles and other shapes.
A Doom map is divided into 'sectors', each evaluates to a flat, complex polygon. It would be easy enough to decompose a simple, convex polygon into triangles, as there are many algorithms for this.
But many of the sector polys are concave, and some even. Find the area of polygons by decomposing into triangles, rectangles, parallelograms, and trapezoids An updated version of this instructional video is available.
Instructional video Archived. SAT Math Test Prep Online Crash Course Algebra & Geometry Study Guide Review, Functions,Youtube - Duration: The Organic Chemistry Tutor 1, views.A regular polygon can be analyzed easily if we think of it as having been built from isosceles triangles with the unequal side A B = S, AB=S, A B = S, the equal sides O A = O B = R, OA=OB= R, O A = O B = R, and the unequal angle ∠ A O B = 2 ϕ \angle AOB=2\phi ∠ A .Example 1 (10 minutes): Decomposing Polygons into Rectangles Example 1: Decomposing Polygons into Rectangles.
The Intermediate School is producing a play that needs a special stage bui lt. A diagram is shown below (not to scale). a. On the first diagram, divide the stage into three rectangles using two horizontal lines.